Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Royal Romance Speculation

THE ONES THAT GOT A WAY   (A shorter version of this was published in Majesty some years ago)

Before the Prince of Wales married Lady Diana Spencer in 1981, he was rumored to be on the verge of marriage with pretty Americans, British aristocrats and foreign princesses. In one instance, he was reported engaged to a princess he barely knew. In June 1977, the Daily Express splashed "Charles to Marry Astrid - Official." The article was written by the paper’s normally reliable political editor, who said the engagement would be announced on the following Monday. Charles and Princess Marie-Astrid of Luxembourg "fell for each other at that first meeting," which allegedly had taken place the year before. The Luxembourg Princess was Roman Catholic, and "a novel constitutional arrangement" would allow the sons to be raised Anglican, and any daughters would be Catholic.

The story was false. Downing Street and Special Branch officers were able to provide the mole with inaccurate, but plausible, information about the Prince of Wales’s engagement that would be leaked to the paper. The plot worked, and the source was discovered, and "discreetly retired."

Yet, the story would not die, and the palace was obliged to release another statement: "They are not getting married this Monday, next Monday, the Monday after, or any other Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday. They do not know each other and people who do not know each other do not get engaged. The Royal Family do not go in for arranged marriages."

Not knowing each other has never stopped the media from reporting the possibility of a royal engagement.

Queen Victoria encouraged marriages outside the traditional royal caste. She wrote to her eldest daughter: "that if no fresh blood was infused occasionally the races would degenerate finally - physically and - morally - for . . . all the Protestant Royal Families were related to each other and so were the Catholic ones!"

It was also a change acknowledged by King George V and Queen Mary. On July 17, 1917, the king wrote in his diary: "I've also informed the [Privy] Council that May and I decided some time ago that our children would be allowed to marry into British families. It was quite a historic occasion."

Then, as now, the American media, hungered for news of Britain’s royal family. The New York Times eagerly published reports about the British royal romances. In February 1909, it was reported that Princess Beatrice of Edinburgh, a niece of King Edward VII, was going to marry to King Manoel of Portugal. But Beatrice, a younger sister of Queen Marie of Roumania, was already engaged to Prince Alfonso de Orléans-Borbon, a first cousin of King Alfonso XIII of Spain.

Manoel was determined to marry an English princess. The New York Times noted that negotiations were "in progress during King Manoel’s visit at Windsor with a view to his securing an English bride." The princess in question was Princess Patricia of Connaught, "the living embodiment of sweet English girlhood." Patricia was at the castle to meet Manuel, as was Princess Alexandra of Fife, "the other English princess in the running." Although some favored Princess Alexandra, the elder the two daughters of Princess Louise, the King’s sister, she "is still a child, and the yea and nay ordained by Scripture forms her sole contribution to conversation." Patricia, having already turned down King Alfonso XIII of Spain, was not interested in marrying a king. Manoel returned home without an English bride. A year later, he lost his throne in a revolution.

In 1910, Princess Alexandra of Fife was linked to Prince Christopher of Greece. A headline, "Anglo-Grecian Romance," touted the engagement as Christopher had spent several weeks as a guest of her parents at Mar Lodge in Scotland. It was noted that Christopher "conceived a very obvious passion for the daughter of the house." This was not the story as related by Prince Christopher in his memoirs. Christopher, a nephew of Queen Alexandra, assumed that a marriage "would meet with everyone’s approval", as Louise’s younger sister, Victoria, had promised "to arrange everything."

They "got engaged on the sly," but waited four days before approaching her parents. The Duke of Fife would "dispel any illusion" that Christopher would have in marrying his daughter.

In the early part of the 20th century, most of the press attention was centred on the Prince of Wales, but his younger siblings also received news coverage about possible marriages. In February 1926, the New York Times noted "the engagement of Prince Henry, third son of King George, to Lady Mary Scott, a younger daughter of the Duke of Buccleuch, it is understood, will be announced soon after the period of court mourning for Dowager Queen Alexandra, which ends tomorrow."

This marriage will "undoubtably prove a popular match in Great Britain, where, since the war, there has been a strong sentiment in favor of royal Princes marrying the daughters of British houses instead of foreign princes."

Tomorrow came and went, and no engagement was announced. Three years later, Prince Henry, who had been created the Duke of Gloucester, was expected to announce his engagement the duke of Buccleuch’s youngest daugher, 23- year old Lady Angela Scott, a "pretty brunette who loves open air life and is a good rider to the hounds." The engagement was "likely to be announced soon," after King George recovered from an illness. The King recovered, but no announcement.

It was another Scott sister, Lady Alice who married Prince Henry, the Duke of Gloucester, in 1935.

When Princess Ingrid of Sweden arrived unexpectedly in London in 1932, she quickly "became the most talked about girl in Great Britain." Some assumed that Ingrid was going to marry King George V’s fourth son, Prince George, Ingrid, whose mother was a British princess, often spent time in England with her grandfather, the Duke of Connaught. This time, Ingrid joined Princess Alice, Countess of Athlone and her husband, Lord Athlone, and the Prince of Wales and Prince George for an "intimate dinner" at George’s York House apartment. The news of their dinner together only "strengthened rumors of an impending announcement" of Princess Ingrid’s engagement to Prince George.

Ingrid’s father and stepmother were expected to arrive in London a week later, and "it is believed that the engagement will be officially announced soon thereafter." The stories ceased after Ingrid had returned to Sweden. A year later, the paper reported that "there was a persistent rumor in English society that a marriage is being arranged" between Prince George, youngest son of the King, and an American heiress Grace Vanderbilt, daughter of General and Mrs. Cornelius Vanderbilt of New York.

But it was the August 19, 1934 headline that really caught the attention of reporters on both sides of the Atlantic. "Prince George of Britain Sought as Husband for Greek Princess by King of Yugoslavia." The Greek princess in question was Princess Marina, the youngest of three daughters of Prince and Princess Nicholas. "The friendly matrimonial intrigue was directed by King Alexander "who wished to see Prince George marry the 27-year-old Princess Marina."

On 26 August, Prince George, then in Salzburg, attending a music festival with Prince and Princess Paul and Princess Marina, told a reporter:"There is no truth at all in these rumors."

There are times when no means yes. The official announcement came two days later. The couple were married in November 1934.

The oft-rumored relationship between the then Princess Elizabeth and Prince Philip of Greece was one of the rare occasions when the media was nearly always right.

In his diary in 1941, the American-born Chips Channon wrote: "....Philip of Greece was there. He is extraordinarily handsome .... He is to be our Prince Consort, and that is why he is serving in our Navy." He was spot on, three years before the newspapers began serious speculation about then Princess Elizabeth’s marriage. In September 1945, a New York Times headline read: "Greek Prince’s Name Linked to Elizabeth." The Palace denied that report, just as they denied a report a week earlier that the princess was going to marry the 41-year-old Prince Charles of Belgium. The paper also published a profile of Elizabeth’s future: "Marriage a la Mode Finding a husband today is a problem even for "the most eligible girl in the world."

"Time and time again stories have circulated in the press at home and abroad hinting at impending engagements," wrote Harry Vosser in 1945. "No doubt there will be many more before the engagement of Princess Elizabeth is officially announced from Buckingham Palace. "

Vosser also offered a list the names who were linked "with the world’s most eligible girl." The first name on the list was 23-year-old Prince Philip. Rumours of the marriage "circulated in diplomatic circles", but were denied by the Palace. The tale "sprang from the fact that before the war Prince Philip spent a lot of time in Britain and during the war spent many leaves at Windsor Castle." Other candidates included "an unspecified American," whose marriage "would strengthen the bonds between the United States and Britain; The Duke of Rutland; the Earl of Euston, and the aforementioned Prince Charles of Belgium.

The rumours about Philip persisted through 1946. "Despite denials, Princess Elizabeth is believed engaged," headlined one article in November of that year. One month later, a front page story declared "Princess Elizabeth and Philip to Wed; Troth Delayed." Their intention to "marry was confirmed by sources with close contacts with both the Government and palace, not withstanding official denials that they are engaged." The delay, according to report, was blamed on the political situation in Greece. The paper also reported that the prince would become a British subject the following February and would renounce his right to the Greek throne. At that time, the Princess would be in South Africa with her parents and younger sister.

The official announcement came on July 9, 1947. "Everyone has been gossiping and speculating about this royal romance for months. Royalty live like goldfish in a Bowl and there was not a shopgirl or clerk who could not have told you long ago that Elizabeth was in love with her cousin Philip and that she was determined to marry him," was the comment in The New York Times front page story.

The late Princess Margaret would also be the subject of marital interest. In 1948, rumours of Margaret’s engagement to Prince Georg of Denmark, "became stronger" after he had been assigned "at his own request" as a military attache at the Danish Embassy in London. For some months, he had been seen "frequently in the company of Princess Margaret." It was understood, at least according to the report, that the engagement would not be announced until after Margaret’s 18th birthday in August of that year. Prince Georg, who was ten years Margaret’s senior, was married in 1950 to Margaret’s cousin, Anne Bowes Lyon.

Although Britons "were all aflutter" with newspaper reports in 1952 that Margaret was planning to marry the Earl of Dalkeith, Buckingham Palace issued a statement denying the story. "Therefore there is nothing to be said except that this young man has been invited to Windsor. Thus, a dinner invitation does not mean an engagement will follow.

The Princess would also be linked to a German prince, Henry of Hesse, in 1959, after she spent time with him during a five-day Roman holiday. "Protocol offices and British diplomats were aflutter and romantic Romans were delighted" by the alleged romance. Henry, a distant cousin, was a successful artist and scenic designer. The prince was merely acting as Margaret’s host, as she was already involved in a relationship with Antony Armstrong-Jones.

The late Duke of Windsor was perhaps subjected to more rumours about marriages than any other royal. Nearly every eligible European princess from Astrid of Sweden to Beatriz of Spain was considered fair game. According to one recent biographer, the Prince of Wales "had never given serious thought to marriage with a suitable royal princess." Although King George V and Queen Mary had approved of their children marrying non-royals, apparently the word never got to David. He did have a serious relationship in 1918 with Lady Rosemary Leveson-Gower, although Queen Mary had cautioned him against marrying her. A year later, when Rosemary’s engagement was announced, David wrote to his then mistress, Freda Dudley Ward: "I can"t help feeling a little sad .... she was the only girl I felt I ever could marry & I knew it was défendu (forbidden) by my family."

Queen Mary"s opposition was due to "a taint of blood in her mother’s family."

King George V was not known as a great communicator, especially with his children, and it was not until 1932, when he asked David if he had ever thought about marrying an English woman. The Prince of Wales replied "that he had never supposed it would be possible."

In a New York Times editorial, "Whom will the Prince choose," the writer weighed carefully the options available to the heir to the throne, and concluded that "the idea of limiting the Prince’s choice to the circle of the blood royal is generally poohed-poohed."

The Prince of Wales"s important relationships were sadly confined to married women, although at the time, the British press remained reverential in its coverage of the royal family. It would have been unthinkable at that time to have reported on the Prince’s mesalliances.

In 1919, reports of the "impending engagement" of the Prince of Wales and Princess Jolana of Italy were "unfounded." The Prince of Wales, then on a visit to Paris, wrote to Freda Dudley Ward: "French papers are full of my engagement to the Queen’s [of Italy] eldest girl being as good as official today!!!! .... it naturally infuriates me particularly as the girl has a face like a bottom."

As early as 1916, the New York Times wrote that the Prince of Wales was to "seek the hand" of Princess Jolanda. This rumour came as a surprise to the Italians because it "was supposed that the British prince would marry one of the daughters if Emperor Nicholas II of Russia." A year later, the Prince "answered for himself the question whom he will marry." One London paper’s story, which was reported in the New York Times, said that David "has decided to ask for the hand of his first cousin, Princess Maud." In 1920, the American paper republished comments from a Times editorial suggesting that it was time for the Prince of Wales to marry, preferably an English girl. At the time, the favourite was a war widow, 31-year-old Lady Joan Mulholland, a lady-in-waiting to the Prince’s sister, Mary, and "the prettiest woman at court." The second choice was Lady Dorothy Cavendish, a daughter of the Duke of Devonshire. She appeared as a possible candidate because :"the Prince is said to have paid her attention during his Canadian trip."

"As matters stand, she need not be of royal blood. But she must be of royal demeanor. She must know by instinct what to do and when and how.... She must dazzle without being dazzled, "was the view of the author of a 1922 profile "The Prince, Prize Matrimonial. In January 1922, a newspaper headline read: "Prince of Wales to Wed Daughter of Scotch Earl." The engagement would be made official in the "next two to three days," and it was noted that the young woman in question, Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, 22, was once "reported engaged to the Duke of York."

This was a case of right girl, wrong prince. A few months later, Lady Elizabeth became engaged to the Duke of York.

Although the future Edward VIII never made an effort to give up his married mistresses, marry and produce and heir, newspapers continued to report on romances that never were, and never would be. When he visited Wales in May 1934, it was reported that there would be a "forthcoming announcement" of an "engagement with a young lady not unconnected with Wales." The prince had stayed with Lord and Lady Blythswood, the parents of a comely daughter, the Hon. Olive Douglas-Campbell. Lady Blythswood was rather blunt about the story: "There is no truth whatever in the rumour."

Three years before her alleged engagement to Prince George, Princess Ingrid of Sweden’s engagement to the Prince of Wales was "forecast" to be imminent. The Princess and her father and stepmother, had dined with the Prince of Wales, and "belief is growing in some quarters here that announcement of the engagement" would be made in "the next two weeks."

It was also reported that the Prince of Wales was going to marry Princess Astrid of Sweden, "one of the prettiest girls in Europe, a keen sportswoman and a delightful dancer." Astrid had visited England as a guest of Queen Alexandra, but David "hardly went near her." Infanta Beatriz of Spain, whose grandmother, Princess Beatrice, was Queen Victoria’s youngest child, was also rumoured to be the princess-most-likely to marry the Prince of Wales. Her father, King Alfonso XIII, would not allow her to visit London because "of rumors linking her with the Prince."

Even after succeeding to the throne -- and most of the world was aware of his relationship with Wallis Simpson - the media still offered hope of a royal marriage. "King Edward VIII may don his crown of England next May with a second cousin kneeling at his side," reported the New York Times on July 4, 1936. The two Princesses, "both talented and beautiful," were named as the favourites to marry the king were Princess Frederika of Hanover, a granddaughter of the exiled Kaiser Wilhelm II, and Princess Alexandrine Louise of Denmark. Some months earlier, Alexandrine’s father, Prince Harald had "vigorously denied" the story, although the rumours persisted until August 1936 when Alexandrine’s engagement to a Count Luitpold zu Castell-Castell was announced. The other "co-favourite" Princess Frederika married then Crown Prince Paul of Greece in January 1938.

In view of the Duke of Windsor’s eventual marital partner, the American-born Wallis Warfield Simpson, it is rather amusing to note that in 1919 a New York Times headline read: "Suggests Wales Wed an American." The newspaper was reporting on several stories published in the British press that suggested the Prince of Wales should marry an American woman. "The fact is that there is a keen desire that the Prince shall be allowed to choose for himself a British wife " if not an American. His marriage with a British bride would be exceedingly popular. If he should choose an American bride, the enthusiasm on both sides of the Atlantic would be unbounded and the dramatic possibilities would be opened up. The example would be infectious, and there is no telling where the consequences would end."

The "dramatic possibilities" led to the King’s abdication in December 1937. The consequences culminated with his marriage to a twice divorced American woman.