Memo to Paul Burrell: Shut up, unless you can get your facts straight.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1180778/Paul-Burrell-faces-wrath-Princes-William-Harry-reveals-Dianas-secrets-TV-interview.html
You were not working for the Prince and Princess of Wales when Harry was born. The Prince of Wales was present when Diana gave birth to Harry, just as he was present when William was born. The day after Henry's birth, Charles brought William to the hospital to meet his little brother. Later in the day, Charles returned to St. Mary's Hospital, Paddington, to bring Diana and their new son home.
Charles never said that he never loved Diana. In an interview with Ingrid Seward only few weeks before her death, Diana said that she knew Charles loved her in the beginning, and she wished she could make public his love letters.
Moreover, Charles was not involved with Camilla in 1985. This was made clear by Diana in her interview, and also acknowledged by Andrew Morton, who would have gotten his information from Diana.
The adultery began -- on both sides -- in 1986.
All of this can be easily checked. Diana's Rock has gone off his Rocker far too many times now. Please shut up, Paul Burrell.
2 comments:
Your facts are correct. Diana also said in an interview and also Morton's book that she knew the marriage was over when Harry was born. Charles commented that his son had red hair and not much else. Diana knew she was having another boy but didn't tell Charles because he was hoping for a girl. Charles was very loving during this pregnancy, according to Diana, but all that changed when a boy was born and not a girl.
I have my doubts about the Henry story because Charles would have known that he would have been responsible for Harry's sex. I would think that Diana's comments to Morton (as were many comments) revisionist history on her part.
Post a Comment