tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762674434623075554.post8060875652906203699..comments2024-03-29T04:20:44.056-04:00Comments on Royal Musings: Succession to the Crown Act 2013Marlene Eilers Koenighttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14984860671065161997noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762674434623075554.post-2928522751274649812013-07-31T00:08:12.976-04:002013-07-31T00:08:12.976-04:00Evan, it has nothing to do with events in the UK. ...Evan, it has nothing to do with events in the UK. In order for the new law to take place, ALL 16 REALMS have to pass the bill. Only the UK has passed the law. The other 25 realms have passed the legislation. Until that happens, the Act remains in limbo.Marlene Eilers Koenighttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14984860671065161997noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762674434623075554.post-42835143552854364782013-07-30T22:22:31.168-04:002013-07-30T22:22:31.168-04:00I think that it's unfortunate that the Act see...I think that it's unfortunate that the Act seems to have stalled. Even with the birth of Prince George, it seems that it should have passed, considering that the Queen signed it. Is the real reason for opposition because the Act may be used as a basis to challenge peerage remainders?evanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18350112568162354415noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762674434623075554.post-37418855991131881902013-07-30T12:19:41.763-04:002013-07-30T12:19:41.763-04:00It would affect only those born after 10-28-2011. ...It would affect only those born after 10-28-2011. Michael and George would be dynasts ...but at this point, everything moot because only one of 16 realms has passed the legislation. Marlene Eilers Koenighttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14984860671065161997noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8762674434623075554.post-3647541450416462842013-07-30T11:29:39.500-04:002013-07-30T11:29:39.500-04:00Question on the act. With eliminating primogenitur...Question on the act. With eliminating primogeniture, it's been said that it'll be from this point forward (not retroacted to move the Princess Royal up the line, etc). So would removal of the marriage to Catholics ban, would it be retroacted for Prince Michael and Lord St. Andrews? Matthew Ploosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15310027974512497631noreply@blogger.com