How absolutely vile ... silly ... and ridiculous ... and based on a truly daft idea that she was born to come to England and marry into royalty - and the choice was Peter Phillips ... WHO IS NOT A ROYAL!
I looked at the prospectus, for Princess Prep. Absolute tosh. Jerramy Fine is a described as a royal expert. Really? She provides a list of princesses who will be discussed - and refers to some as reigning. Only the sovereign reigns. She refers to the late Diana, Princess of Wales as Princess Diana of Wales ... did Charles and Diana have a daughter named Diana? Princess Victoria of England? There has never been a princess Victoria of England. Perhaps this alleged royalty expert is referring to Princess Alexandrina Victoria of Kent who was a Princess of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. Or perhaps her daughter, HRH The Princess Royal (or Empress Friedrich) .. or perhaps, HRH Princess Victoria of Wales who became HRH The Princess Victoria when her father, George V, succeeded to throne.
Or click on a photo of someone who is described as Crown Princess Letizia of Spain. Really? There is no such person. The heir to the Spanish throne is the Prince of Asturias, not the Crown Prince, which means his wife is the Princess of Asturias.
Click on another photo -- showing Queen Elizabeth II - and the credit reads Princess Elisabeth. Yup, Elisabeth. I believe this photo was taken after Elizabeth succeeded to the throne.
Has Fine secured copyright clearance for the photos she uses on her site? She does not provide the copyright details! Click on another photo - Mary Poppins - for a night out at the theater. Mary Poppins closed in 2008 in London.
I believe the heroine of Frances Hodgson Burnett's A Little Princess was named Sara Crewe, not Sarah Crewe.
Will Fine be paying royalties to the movie companies for the movies she intends to show? There is a hefty fee for the week in London ($3,995 sans flight), which means the movie audience will be a Paid audience. In other words, Disney and other movie companies might not see the endeavor as fair use!
This sort of tosh gives a bad name to scholarship. Serious biographers are having major problems in getting good books to publishers. Instead, we get nonsense, trite, piffle. Perfect for parents who have lots of money, and really believe that this sort of trip is good for their darling little girls. A great gift for the Paris Hilton wannabees.
I love Disney, but I also know the difference between fantasy and reality. There is nothing real about Princess Prep ... what a waste of $4000 plus air fare. Save the fantasy for Disney World (which I adore), and don't mix it with the reality of the depth of the panoply of British history. Unlike Giselle or Ariel, real princesses are human being, and are not perfect. Their lives on perfect. They don't always get to live happily ever after.
Americans do not need to send their daughters to England to learn etiquette. That's something that's learned at home. Charity! The families that can afford to send their daughters to fantasy camp are not always the ones who do charity. Sure, take the family to Britain, rent an apartment or stay in a nice hotel, and tour - but see the history on its own terms, and not through rose-colored glasses.
True charity begins at home. What about taking your children to Sunday school and church. Teach your children about truly helping others by spending time volunteering at a food bank or homeless shelter.
I suppose this Princess Prep nonsense is for the daughters of the Nanny Diaries crowd!